Consider this on Tuesday
When remembering the brave Americans on Tuesday who served this republic -- especially those who made the ultimate sacrifice -- remember the people who put them in harm's way.
Veterans Day, which was known as Armistice Day until 1954, honors American veterans of all wars on Nov. 11.
What many of them experienced doing their duty is almost incomprehensible. Sing their praises to the heavens. Shower them with all the glory they so richly deserve. Thank God so many put their lives on the line to help make this the greatest nation in history.
But after the parade bands stop marching, the bunting is decommissioned and the bystanders stop waving those little American flags, consider why so many have been wounded or lost -- and if anything can be done to lessen the need for more rehab hospitals and national cemeteries.
The public should ask itself if it's ever done a disservice to its service men and women when expedience trumped the U.S. Constitution. And if so, how many in our military paid -- and how dearly.
Congress has formally declared war during five conflicts: with Great Britain in 1812, Mexico in 1846, Spain in 1898 and the two world wars.
However, this nation has used its armed forces abroad in situations of military or potential conflict (or for other than normal peacetime purposes) more than 420 times, according to a report by Richard F. Grimmett, a congressional research service defense specialist at the Library of Congress.
U.S. forces have been in Afghanistan to Zaire, the Fiji Islands, Hawaiian Islands and Falkland Islands, Samoa, Sumatra and, yes, even Soviet Russia. The U.S. battled Barbary pirates and Mexican bandits but also deployed troops to protect American interests in foreign lands -- too many times and in too many places (like Korea and Vietnam) -- to fight and maybe die.
There have been about 100,000 American military fatalities in these undeclared wars or "conflicts" abroad, says Eric Garris. "It's horrendous." He is the director of antiwar.com , a site supporting a noninterventionist U.S. military policy and adherence to the rule of law.
"A lot of the presidents' actions take place not for strategic planning, just political events. How can you justify even one person being killed for that reason?" Mr. Garris asks. "At best, Congress has passed advisory votes that say to presidents, 'We advise you to get out within a year.' They essentially have left it to the presidents, which is a violation of the U.S. Constitution. They are relinquishing their responsibility."
Like the undeclared war in Iraq.
Congress abrogated its responsibility, says Jacob Hornberger, lawyer and president the Future of Freedom Foundation, a nonprofit organization in the Washington, D.C., area that espouses libertarian philosophy. "They said, 'We don't want to make that call. We'll just delegate to the president to make the call.' They weren't declaring war. It's not only unconstitutional, it was the height of political cowardice."
CNN reports that the U.S. conducted a "successful" strike in Syria on Oct. 26, targeting a suspected smuggler of foreign fighters, money and weapons into Iraq.
Enjoy the parades on Tuesday.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.