| News

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Lynn Swann in 2008'

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Off Road Politics connects Washington with Main Street hosted by Salena Zito and Lara Brown PhD. Exclusive radio show on @TribLIVE

  • Loading...

Daily Photo Galleries

Sunday, June 24, 2007

In the summer of 2004, Lynn Swann stood on a sweltering stage in front of several thousand party faithful in Latrobe. Stalling for a delayed President Bush, he joked that wouldn't he and Latrobe native Arnold Palmer, standing to his right, "make the perfect ticket for governor of Pennsylvania in 2006?"

The response was deafeningly positive.

Three summers and one failed attempt at governor later, according to a variety of inside sources Swann is contemplating another run for office, in a considerably less dramatic fashion.

Swann, who lost to Gov. Ed Rendell last year, now has an eye on Pennsylvania's 4th Congressional District.

Despite his rookie status and less-than-stellar campaign, he was the only Republican to win the 4th District in 2006 -- which is part of the reason why U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum and U.S. Rep. Melissa Hart are now referred to as "former."

If he decides to run, he would take on freshman congressman and Democrat Jason Altmire of McCandless.

Swann's first decision-making hurdle is whether he wants to go to Washington or to stick around Pennsylvania and run for governor again. His second hurdle is the congressional seat's former occupant, Melissa Hart, who is coy about whether she wants to take back her seat. Look for her to run a poll to test the waters of her electability.

Most insiders not-so-quietly agree that Hart gave up her seat to Jason Altmire; in a horrible year for Republicans, she allowed Altmire to define her as a clone of President Bush and Santorum. Failing to draw a contrast, refusing to respond with accurate information about who he was and why Altmire would be wrong for the district, Hart gave it away in the end.

Soured by the outcome of that particular campaign, GOP stakeholders in Washington have turned to Swann as a candidate who could win back the district.

For its part, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is just as invested in retaining Altmire's services as congressman. It made him a member of its aggressive Frontline program, which is dedicated to spending resources on "purple" House seats, districts that could swing for either party.

Experts on both sides agree a Swann-Altmire race would cost $3 million to $5 million in candidate and party money, ranking it in the top five House races for 2008.

Thanks to a political-climate change, Altmire got a bit of a free ride the last time. But he has wisely positioned himself, according to an analysis by Congressional Quarterly, as the sixth most conservative Democrat in the House, a good fit for the district.

To really stake out that seat as his, he must pick one big policy item and get it passed in the House, something perhaps dealing with health care or veterans issues.

Swann has a couple important things on his side -- an ability to raise cash and perfect name identification. Yet he has more obstacles to overcome. He has to prove to voters that he has learned a heck of a lot since 2006. Forget the buses with his image shrink-wrapped on them; this is about handshakes, a total bone-up on local issues and establishing an early, clear definition of his positions on the Iraq war, Social Security and federal spending.

Swann is in a party where the brand has been shredded. He is tied to an unpopular president and may be running for office in a Congress that has a 14 percent approval rating.

If he jumps into the race, he must get beyond running uphill and run as though the seat was open by characterizing Altmire as just a default winner in 2006.

One of the hardest things a congressional challenger running against an incumbent must do is to convince people they made an error in the last election.

But that must be the agenda for any Republican Party candidate trying to retake the House.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.




Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Polamalu could be next in long line of Steelers greats given unceremonial exit
  2. Penguins’ Lovejoy embracing defensive pairing with Pouliot
  3. Over the falls — Cucumber Falls that is — go 3 kayakers in OhioPyle
  4. Wolf reverses Corbett, says deal between Highmark, UPMC doesn’t limit continuity of care to very ill
  5. Federal jury says gas company shorted owners on royalties
  6. Multi-vehicle crash shuts down Parkway East outbound
  7. Rossi: Kang would benefit from less attention
  8. Football star’s mom embraced life with gusto
  9. Experts: Clinton took dangerous path with email system
  10. Hempfield man charged with giving gun to teen girl
  11. Penguins notebook: Road trip increases in difficulty