Stimulated' Not jobs
An American Recovery and Reinvestment Act stimulus sign guards the majestic National Trust for Historic Preservation building just beyond DuPont Circle.
The sign, like so many others Americans have seen along highways the past two years, proudly marks a spot where "Your government is at work for you."
"Maybe it's stimulating the grass to grow?" remarked a friend as we hustled down Massachusetts Avenue, seeing no construction in sight.
The sign has stood there for nearly a year. It provided no stimulus funding for the National Trust or its grass. But new sidewalks are being installed behind the building, said someone answering the phone at the Trust, and the District of Columbia Department of Transportation "has been working on it since at least July."
According to the D.C. DOT's stimulus website, the sidewalk project has been ongoing since October 2009. It does not state how many jobs were stimulated; in fairness, that probably is difficult to gauge -- since the project was slated before the stimulus was enacted.
Though the nation's unemployment rate is 9 percent (not the 7 percent the White House projected if the stimulus act worked), White House press secretary Jay Carney said Thursday that the stimulus has added "several million jobs" and "lowered the unemployment rate. ... The goals of the stimulus package have been met."
This administration still doesn't get it -- or doesn't read its own jobs reports.
Middle America's voters, especially Democrats and independents who supported Barack Obama in 2008, still feel a major disconnect with this administration.
In 2010 they told Washington they wanted a new approach. What they were looking for most was fiscal responsibility from the federal government.
When President Obama appointed his bipartisan debt commission late last winter, a sigh went up from fiscally conservative Democrats that the White House was taking America's demands -- fiscal responsibility and bipartisanship -- seriously.
Yet in his budget released last week, it is hard to find evidence that Obama incorporated any of the commission's recommendations for cutting entitlements.
Nor does his budget provide guidelines to deal with the growth of Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.
Voters told Washington to tighten its belt and balance its books, just as their families have had to do. What they've gotten is more out-of-control deficit spending with no regard for future implications.
Worse, Americans are not seeing the benefits of deficit spending. It's not giving them better lives. It's not fixing their problems.
Public policy is supposed to be about fixing society's problems, and federal budgets should be about protecting the country and keeping the trains running.
Policy often is politicians' reactionary effort to fix a problem, a deliberate government plan to address an issue and change behaviors.
The stimulus act and the tax cuts spent a lot of money, running up the national deficit and debt. Much stimulus spending simply went to relieving state budgets; it did not change behaviors, and that is bad public policy.
When proposed, the stimulus act was deemed so necessary. If true, its money should have gone to much-needed infrastructure improvements. At least then, we'd have something to show for so much being spent. More importantly, we would have changed behaviors.
Businesses, particularly small businesses, would have created jobs leading to more permanent employment; people would have had incentives to retrain in technology, and access to improved mass transit and mass communications.
Last month, Allentown Metal Works -- a century-old Lehigh Valley factory that Obama used as a backdrop a year ago to promote a big jobs bill -- closed.
Obama's visit there kicked off a multi-city tour following his "jobs summit" in Washington.
Last week, Carney dismissed questions about the effectiveness of the stimulus act.
"We've said repeatedly that we don't want to re-litigate the battles of the past," he told a reporter.
His remark came the same mid-February day when U.S. unemployment, as measured by Gallup without seasonal adjustment, hit 10 percent -- up from 9.8 percent at the end of January.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
- Steelers notebook: Tomlin bringing officials to practice
- LNG exports get federal approval from Dominion’s Cove Point terminal
- Safety worries prompt PennDOT to order nighttime closures on Parkway West
- Dallas hospital officials confirm 1st Ebola case diagnosed in U.S.
- Pittsburgh rallies for second year of Pirates magic
- Public station WQED cutting staff in face of financial woes
- Police find pipe bombs in woods during manhunt for suspect in trooper ambush
- Steelers film session: Harrison on the field often
- Pittsburgh spends $11,701 for police to patrol bike lane, mostly on overtime pay
- Somerset man accused of taking son, 3, along on burglary
- Jaguars’ Bortles is mirror image of Steelers’ Roethlisberger