TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Politician cameras'

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Thursday, Dec. 21, 2006
 

Pittsburgh Councilman Bill Peduto's traffic cameras are a bad idea (" Drivers will hate Kodak moments ," Mike Seate column, Dec. 14 and PghTrib.com).

They are, at best, the law enforcement counterpart to those maddening automated phone menus. They are, at worst, a dangerous step toward a surveillance state. They are, at least, another reason to avoid Pittsburgh.

To politicians still unconvinced, let's consider the question from another perspective.

Suppose we mandate surgically attached cameras and microphones for all Pittsburgh politicians.

It stands to reason that 24/7 monitoring of Pittsburgh politicians might have prevented, or at least identified, those complicit in the fiscal crimes and policy blunders that have besieged Pittsburgh and spread costs far beyond city limits.

If monitoring politicians stops just one bribe, patronage job, eminent-domain seizure, misuse of public money or shady backroom deal, then aren't a few implants worth it for the greater good?

Mark Crowley Plum

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Bringing military dogs home
  2. ATI should appreciate workers
  3. Course correction
  4. Few buy Confederate flags
  5. Confederate flags & violence
  6. ACA ruling good
  7. Civil War fine moment
  8. Define ‘tough’
  9. True Confederate flag meaning