Teaching kids to kill
Regarding the Trib's " Boy, 11, charged as adult in deaths " (Feb. 22 and PghTrib.com), what can we expect when we let the Pennsylvania Game Commission recruit our children into a youth hunting program?
The game commission was worried because the number of hunters was falling fast and the revenue generated by hunting licenses pays their paychecks. "We need this law because for every 100 hunters who retire, only 62 take up the sport," said Gov. Rendell, so in 2006 they pushed for House Bill 1690, which allows children younger than 12, without hunter education, to go hunting with a parent or guardian.
Children have a natural love and empathy for animals. Forcing kids to kill animals can cause serious psychological problems. There is increasing evidence that many of the shootings and murders by children are done by kids who are hunters.
You have to be 16 to get a driver permit and 18 to vote. We have these laws because children don't have the capacity to understand or accept responsibility.
Allowing children under the age of 12 to use lethal weapons and to teach them how to kill is a moral failure of our state representatives who voted to pass House Bill 1690.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Answer to illegals
- Better border sense
- Apollo-Ridge raises hurt taxpayers
- Springdale high-rise stabbing
- The Declaration
- Stop the whining
- Keeping the ‘faith’
- Why not cash in?
- ‘A life well lived ...’