| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Series a disservice

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Sunday, Feb. 13, 2011

The Trib's Wounded Warriors series on the U.S. Army's Warrior Transition units (WTUs) -- " Documents show Army's disservice to broken soldiers ," " Transition staff for military wounded poorly trained, stigmatized, fatigued " and "Lieutenant colonel finds success treating 'soldier as a person '" (Feb. 6, 7, 8 and -- grossly misrepresents the Army's commitment and success in caring for wounded, ill and injured warriors.

The stories did a disservice not only to the hardworking and dedicated caregivers who are caring for our soldiers, but also to the thousands who are working to recover and transition to the next phase of their lives.

Not only did the stories offer questionable facts and figures, but much was presented out of context. Reporter Carl Prine's claim that WTUs are a "dumping ground" is offensive and inaccurate. In fact, in a recent inspector general survey of almost 800 WTU soldiers, 91 percent indicated that the WTU is the best place to heal and reintegrate back into the Army or transition to care in the Veterans Administration.

We acknowledge that our Warrior Care and Transition Program has had some growing pains since it was created in 2007. The inspector general recently completed an extensive review that identified a number of recommendations for improvement; many are completed and we are working on the rest. The Army is absolutely committed to providing our warriors the best available care and treatment.

I am sure most, if not all, of our wounded, ill and injured warriors would rather be somewhere else -- such as back in their units, doing their jobs with their buddies. However, we continue to improve how we care for our wounded warriors every day. To not recognize that effort, and the professionals who lead it, does a disservice to every American.

Lt. Gen. Eric B. Schoomaker

The writer is surgeon general of the Army and commanding general of the Army Medical Command.

Editor's Note: Lt. Gen. Eric B. Schoomaker and other Army officials were offered more than a dozen opportunities to comment for the Wounded Warriors series, but declined. Schoomaker walked away when approached directly by a Trib reporter. On Thursday, he and Army officials declined to speak directly with the Trib or to answer submitted written questions. Schoomaker, who was to travel to Afghanistan, indicated through a spokesman that he would speak to the newspaper late this month.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. The Vick ‘rub’
  2. Pa. severance tax suffocating
  3. Pipelines to the future
  4. Beware ‘Share the wealth’
  5. MLK Day represents more than one man
  6. Where’s the anger?
  7. A WQED loss
  8. Keep kids safe
  9. Where’s PETA?
  10. The budget impasse