Wounded Warriors reactions I
In relying on outdated information for his Wounded Warriors military health care series (" Documents show Army's disservice to broken soldiers ," " Transition staff for military wounded poorly trained, stigmatized, fatigued " and " Lieutenant colonel finds success treating 'soldier as a person' ," Feb. 6, 7, 8 and TribLIVE.com), the Trib's Carl Prine presented an outdated and inaccurate description of the demobilization process and soldier health care at Fort Stewart, Ga.
We wish Mr. Prine had checked us out for himself before writing on this important topic. If he had, he would have found superb health care and excellent access for all soldiers. A prime example is the demobilization here in December of the 53rd Infantry Brigade Combat Team, 2,414 soldiers of the Florida National Guard. In an organized and well-resourced process, every soldier received a thorough evaluation that included behavioral health.
Ensuring all had access to care, soldiers in soundproof booths could privately consult by video teleconference with behavioral health care providers in other Army installations. Soldiers needing follow-on care had appointments made for them near their homes before they left us. And, while smoothly processing these wonderful Guard soldiers, Fort Stewart was simultaneously reintegrating a brigade of its own returning from Iraq.
Emphasis on quality care extends to our Warrior Transition Battalion (WTB), where 341 soldiers heal in a unit whose capacity is 440. Our WTB uses innovative rehabilitative programs such as biofeedback, therapy dogs, music and art, and adaptive sports programs. And this unit is certainly not "a dumping ground": Each admission is evaluated by a panel of clinicians and leaders, and culminates in review and approval by a general officer.
Much has changed from the Trib's outdated report. We invite Mr. Prine to visit and see all this for himself.
Brig. Gen. Jeffrey E. Phillips
The writer, a member of the Army Reserve, is deputy commanding general of the 3rd Infantry Division.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Race & society
- Wrong on GOP view of Obama
- Social Security woes
- Challenge & media
- Need bus service in West Vandergrift
- AKA joint effort?
- More radio woes
- Laborers’ choice
- ‘And another thing...’
- Better school security
- Oberdorf firing incomprehensible