What EDMC got
Regarding the news story " Lacking law, Pa. left out of recovery lawsuit bid " (Aug. 13 and TribLIVE.com): In these challenging economic times, Education Management Corp. (EDMC), which employed more than 7,000 Pennsylvanians and paid more than $8.75 million in Pennsylvania taxes last year, is committed to creating jobs in the state. EDMC never expected -- and never received -- $25 million in state funds for job-creation efforts.
In our 2009 agreement with the Department of Community and Economic Development, EDMC committed to create 600 jobs over three years and invest $27.9 million in private funds to expand operations and construct a new data center in Southwestern Pennsylvania. Since July 1, 2009, EDMC has created 461 new jobs and invested $41 million in private funds. To support these efforts, the state committed $4.7 million -- a $3 million opportunity grant, job-creation tax credits of $1.2 million and a $500,000 job-training grant.
At the time of this agreement, we had not finalized the new data center's location. Because economic development funding must be site-specific, $5 million was set aside in the capital budget for each of five potential sites. Ultimately, we located our new data center in Robinson. We did not receive any funds designated for other locations.
We are confident that the trust extended to us by the state has been wisely invested -- in infrastructure, jobs and education for Pennsylvania.
Anthony J. Guida Jr.
The writer is senior vice president-external affairs for Education Management Corp. (edmc.edu).
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Food for thought
- Animal abuse
- Poisoned long ago
- Appreciate caregivers
- The real big spenders
- Can’t go it alone
- It’s supposed to be a ‘holiday’