Jack Kemp, R.I.P.
It's always sad when one of the generally acknowledged good guys of the ideological wars dies. Jack Kemp lost his battle with cancer on Saturday. He was 73.
Once a standout quarterback for the Buffalo Bills -- in 1957 he played four games for the Pittsburgh Steelers -- Mr. Kemp became even better known as the nine-term Republican congressman of New York. He was Bob Dole's running mate in the 1996 presidential election.
Kemp was the fellow who, along with Sen. William Roth, R-Del., gave Ronald Reagan not only the intellectual underpinning but practical basis for cutting tax rates in 1981. He was arguably one of the most important people in the modern conservative movement.
Yes, sometimes he was too academic. But credit Kemp with selling President Reagan on the quite valid theory that tax-rate cuts create the rising tides that lift all boats. In the process, greater economic opportunities and, thus, greater economic independence are possible for all.
Contrary to the liberal drumbeat, it works -- if spending is controlled and the effort is not diluted. It's a lesson not many Democrats can comprehend. Unfortunately, too few congressional Republicans mastered the tutorial.
Jack Kemp understood that the more economic freedom there is, the more liberty there is. And economic liberty is the greatest emancipator known to man. Rest in peace, Congressman.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.