ShareThis Page

Laurels & Lances

| Friday, July 24, 2009

On the "Watch List":

• Dan Onorato and Luke Ravenstahl. The Allegheny County chief executive and the mayor of Pittsburgh have begun an eight-month push to bolster census-response rates. Indeed, an accurate count is to the benefit of all. But here's a critical question for them:

Do they support the involvement of ACORN in the survey process• That would be the same ACORN that's accused in a number of states, Pennsylvania included, of voter registration fraud. That would be the same ACORN that aided the subprime mortgage mess by bullying banks to lend to those with dubious financial means.


• The G-20 economic summit. The powers that be keep talking about all the benefits of the Group of 20 meeting scheduled for Pittsburgh in late September. But given the security and restrictions that will be in place, it's time to start asking this: What will the G-20 cost the region's economy• You can't tout "benefits" without calculating the cost of lost business.


Lance: To Anthony Leffler. He's accused of indecently assaulting a child on a Port Authority bus. And here's the kicker: Mr. Leffler was the bus driver -- and he was driving the bus at the time. Investigators say they have videotape evidence of the alleged molestation from the bus' surveillance camera. Stunning. Shocking. Sick.

Laurel: To benevolence. The families of three slain Pittsburgh police officers will share about $1.5 million raised throughout the community. That's a testament to the kind of people Pittsburghers are. And it's a testament to the kind of respected and upstanding people Officers Eric Kelly, Stephen Mayhle and Paul Sciullo II were.

Lance: To Ed Rendell. The Democrat governor who said he would stay neutral in next year's gubernatorial race says on a nationally syndicated radio show that Allegheny County Chief Executive Dan Onorato is "probably our next governor." So much for neutrality. The governor has yet to learn that the best position for his mouth oftentimes is closed.

Laurel: To the ACORN investigation. A half-dozen people associated with the community activist group and charged with voter registration fraud now will stand trial on the charges in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court. The local cases could go a long way in bringing to justice an organization now the subject of investigation in many states.

And that's despite a frivolous federal lawsuit filed by the ACLU on behalf of ACORN that seeks to use euphemisms to rationalize fraud.

Lance : To The Block Bugler. Those wacky, tax-happy editorialists at the Toledo, Ohio, paper are urging that any state budget agreement be put "on ice" until the Legislature authorizes the city of Pittsburgh to raise taxes on nonprofits and commuters. Sounds like dementia to us. If not, it's definite proof that drinking and editorializing don't mix.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.