Those much ballyhooed public state House-Senate conference committee hearings designed to end the long budget impasse were quickly suspended last week. And, as predicted here, a whining Gov. Rendell took the talks back behind closed doors. It's another exercise in screw-the-public politics. ... Don't be fooled by all that gushing over "compromise" health-care reform legislation. National Review reminds that the latest plan "will reduce wages, limit new hires and increase prices." Dimmycrats sure have a funny definition of "reform." ... The Immigration Policy Center calls the Federation for American Immigration Reform "an anti-immigrant hate group." So what should we call IPC, an organization that refers to illegal aliens as "undocumented immigrants"• An "anti-rule-of-law hate group" strikes us as the best fit. ... University of Wisconsin -Milwaukee scholar Mark Schug says the Cash for Clunkers program is virtually useless -- except to politicians. "The biggest losers are taxpayers who are on the hook for a billion dollars spent on a program that almost certainly will have no measurable impact on the environment or increase long-term auto sales." Hey, other than that, it was a marvelous and cost-effective idea, right?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.