ShareThis Page

Midweek briefing ...

| Wednesday, Oct. 28, 2009

Students at Columbia University's School of Journalism have produced a rap song (to Jay-Z's "Empire State of Mind") mocking Fox News and Fox talk show host Sean Hannity. Their failure• An alleged lack of conservative vs. liberal "parity." Which should make us all wonder about the parity of conservative vs. liberal "journalism" students and professors at Columbia. ... Writing in The Bulletin of Philadelphia, Herb Denenberg throws the F-bomb. Yes, Mr. Denenberg says the stench of fascism is growing stronger from the Obama administration. That's based on its use "of the vast resources of the federal government to squelch criticism and silence and intimidate critics." Well, what else would you call it, folks• ... Sen. Arlen Specter , Confused-Pa., has been a Democrat for six months today. (Well, at least this time around.) And he's proving what a suck-up he can be as he expands his role as political opportunist extraordinaire. The pol who supposedly prides himself on an "independence" streak has voted with his new Dimmycrat buddies more than 94 percent of the time. We can only wonder what party Mr. Specter will affiliate with when he's ousted in next spring's primary. Maybe the Scottish Not Provens?

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.