TribLIVE

| News


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Debating health care: Euphemisms ...

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Tuesday, Nov. 3, 2009
 

Shakespeare ("a rose by any other name") and Orwell ("Newspeak") would recognize as insidious Democrat euphemisms aimed at making palatable that which leaves a bad taste in the electorate's mouth.

Discussing health care reform at a Florida senior center, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., referred to "competitive option" and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., referred to "the consumer option" -- not to the "public option."

Mrs. Pelosi contends "public option" -- the government foot in the door that leads to private health insurers' demise -- is a misrepresentation.

That's one heck of a statement from someone who just debuted a new way to misrepresent a concept -- misrepresented by Democrats throughout the debate -- that the public still isn't buying. And that underlines Democrats' unseemly determination to enact "reform" that the American people oppose.

Time will tell whether these Democrat neologisms will deserve induction into the same Hall of Sophistry Shame -- er, Pantheon of Political Rebranding -- that enshrines such all-time lows as "revenue enhancement."

For now, remember that "public option" by any other name stinks just as badly as it always has -- and so does politicians' mangling of language to obfuscate.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read News