Midweek briefing ...
Despite the lurch to the left in much of Latin America, there are a few bright spots. The weekend election of conservative Sebastian Pinera as president of Chile is one of them. It will be a welcome counterbalance to some of the nuttier fruitcakes in the region, such as Venezuela's Hugo Chavez. ... Speaking of those more than a few bricks shy of a load, Mr. Chavez has seized the French-Colombian-owned Exito supermarket/home appliance chain for alleged "price gouging." This, after the regime devalued the bolivar, Venezuela's national currency, last week. This will do wonders for the availability of necessary goods. Ahem. ... Human Events reminds that Attorney General Eric Holder, who wants to afford the Christmas Day jetliner bomber all the rights and privileges of an American citizen in our civilian courts, once thought such terrorists -- enemy combatants -- should enjoy no such consideration. Mr. "Holder puts political convenience above common sense, military tradition and concern for the safety of American citizens," the newspaper notes in an editorial. So much for Eric Holder sticking to his principles. ... Writing in London's Daily Mail newspaper, David Derbyshire reports that a principal claim by the world's leading climate scientists that the Himalayan glaciers will vanish within 25 years was not based on any scientific proof but the speculation by one Indian scientist. Geesh.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.