| News

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

The sugar tax: A sour idea

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Thursday, March 18, 2010

In his continuing quest to tax anything and everything, in his continuing quest to bail out a woefully underfunded city pension system, Pittsburgh Mayor Luke Ravenstahl is proposing a 2-cent-per-ounce tax on sugar-sweetened beverages.

Under the guise of promoting a healthier lifestyle, a 20-ounce soda would cost an additional 40 cents. A 12-pack of your favorite 12-ounce sugared drink would run you almost $3 more.

Of course, the tax, similar to one being proposed in Philadelphia and which would require state legislative approval, is thick and sticky with dichotomies and hypocrisies.

Mr. Ravenstahl says Pittsburgh "continues to seek policies that encourage our residents to maintain a healthy lifestyle." Well, Mr. Mayor, if you really were concerned about that, you'd stop trying to tax the city back to prosperity.

And how sad it is that a pol would propose a tax supposedly to help people but secretly hope they just keep ponying up the tax to bail out a pension system that, by design, is not sustainable and has been the victim of a string of mayoral administrations' gross derelictions of duty.

Another tax is just another thing to make Pittsburgh, still in state receivership, less attractive to those who do or are considering doing business in Pittsburgh.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read News