ShareThis Page

Foul Ayers

| Thursday, March 18, 2010

It's bad enough that 1970s domestic terrorist William Ayers will be the featured speaker at a University of Pittsburgh function on March 26. Worse is that the sponsoring group has whitewashed Mr. Ayers' history in its promotional materials.

The co-founder of the radical Weather Underground will keynote the Spring 2010 Conference of Pitt's Council of Graduate Students in Education a week from Friday. The Weathermen, as they were known, participated in a series of bombings in the early 1970s, including the 1974 bombing of Pittsburgh's Gulf Tower.

Mr. Ayers admits to participating in bombings at a New York City police headquarters in 1970, the U.S. Capitol in 1971 and the Pentagon in 1972. Federal conspiracy charges against him were dropped in 1974 because of illegal surveillance.

But a January newsletter promoting Ayers' appearance does not mention his domestic terrorism past. In part, it notes that Ayers, now 65, has written extensively about "teaching as an essentially intellectual (and) ethical ... enterprise."

One would think that in the interest of education, intellectualism and ethics, Pitt's Council of Graduate Students in Education would be more forthright about the foul life of its honored guest.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.