ShareThis Page

'Bam's legacy

| Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Yet another litmus test on Obamanomics is in and, as anyone with an ounce of sense predicted, the results are not good.

The U.S. Commerce Department says real personal income has dropped by 3.2 percent since President Change took office.

"It is proof that the government can't spend its way to prosperity," Douglas Holtz-Eakin, the former director of the Congressional Budget Office, told The Washington Times.

And given all the capital this president has plans to Hoover out of the economy over the next decade, expect that trend to continue. After all, these cats never seem to learn from history.

The health-care "reform" bill alone is expected to siphon half-a-trillion dollars from the pockets of taxpayers in the next 10 years. And that's really only the beginning. But we know what the end result will be.

With less money, "the rich" won't invest as much money in capital expansion and jobs. In fact, they'll struggle even more to hold on to the capacity and employment levels they now have. Even the specter of higher taxes will traduce investment. Why invest when the heavy hand of government will make such investment unsustainable?

Falling wages. Higher taxes. Less investment. Fewer jobs. That will be the legacy of Obamanomics. And we're only 15 months into this mess.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.