ShareThis Page

Tuesday takes

| Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Twisted Bugler: Those intellectual relativists at The Toledo, Ohio, Block Bugler label the case of two members of the New Black Panther Party who allegedly intimidated voters at a Philadelphia polling place last November as "a silly nonevent by two nobodies." Both were dressed in paramilitary outfits. One wielded a billy club. We can't wait to see how The Bugler characterizes, say, members of the tea party movement showing up at the polls this November with — GASP! — petitions. You can bet it'll be called a "civil rights travesty."

Ferlo's wisdom: State Sen. Jim Ferlo uttered the "s"-word in comments last week regarding the flagging financial situation at the August Wilson Center for African American Culture -- "sustainability." Millions in public, corporate and philanthropic dollars were poured into the architecturally striking facility Downtown. But Mr. Ferlo, the Highland Park Democrat, says that it was immediately clear that the center was relying too much on public dollars. Sustainability always must be the first litmus test of such endeavors.

Speaking of sustainability: That new Arnold-to-Pittsburgh commuter rail line, a project of the Allegheny Valley Railroad, could be a godsend to commuters now forced to navigate the always packed Allegheny River Boulevard and Route 28. There's a nice bolus of private financing in the works. But how much public money will be required• That is the key question to determine this noble effort's sustainability.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.