The Thursday wrap
The real skinny: As the Obama administration continues to insist only "the rich" will face tax increases, Americans for Tax Reform says a majority of the small-business sector will see higher taxes. Fifty-five percent of S corporations and partnerships will see a tax hike, it says. More "progress" from the "progressives."
What a waste: Pennsylvania State Police seized 2,376 marijuana plants growing in a wooded area of Somerset County, reports The Associated Press. What a waste of precious resources, especially in these challenging economic times. One can only imagine how much this folly cost taxpayers.
Palin's appeal: Boston Herald columnist Joe Fitzgerald on the popularity of the former Alaskan governor and GOP veep candidate: "What bothers her is what's bothering us ... ." In so many ways, she's become America's conscience.
Rational assessment: The Claremont Review's William Voegeli says America would be wise to see a "government that is both limited and vigorous, scrupulous about upholding the principles of republicanism but energetic and prudent about working with the framework created by those principles to respond to economic and social changes with policies that advance the people's prosperity and security." Now there are some tasty morsels for thought.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.