Gates, Defense & Hillary: Deft moves
Credit Bob Gates with being a class act.
Mr. Gates, the secretary of Defense, tells Foreign Policy magazine that he plans to step down sometime next year. The only Republican member of the George W. Bush administration to be kept on by Democrat President Barack Obama (a wise move in a time of war) says he did not want the selection of his successor to become the stuff of political machinations.
Gates originally had talked of leaving in January 2012, a presidential election year. So, hats off to Gates for attempting to limit the political circus.
That said, speculation is running rampant about Gates' successor. And more than a few are mentioning Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as a possibility. It's worth serious consideration.
Mrs. Clinton clearly has solidified her credentials at State. And even before, in 2008, she impressed the Trib's editorial board with her rapid-fire extemporaneous assessment of the world's trouble spots. Couple that with what's described as her warm relationship with the military and Defense secretary could be a smart fit.
Oh, yes, there is a political calculation to all this: Should Mr. Obama be a one-term president, the extra line on Hillary Clinton's resume and the experience certainly would bolster her credibility in 2016. But, sans the political considerations, the nation could do far worse than Hillary Clinton running the Pentagon.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.