ShareThis Page

Midweek briefing ...

| Wednesday, Aug. 18, 2010

President Obama was for the Islamic community center/mosque a few blocks from Ground Zero in New York City before he was against it. We think. Or was he against it before he was for it• Or was he for it on constitutional grounds or ag'in it on its wisdom before he was for it on constitutional grounds and was forced to backtrack on its wisdom. Whew! How about simply calling the whole thing off• ... What's one of the world's largest mass-transit systems to do when demand routinely outstrips capacity• If you're the transit system in New York City, you consider an approach employed routinely in Paris. The system is considering double-decker trains for some routes. The real attraction is that they cost the same as single-level passenger cars but can carry a third more passengers. Here's to using one's noggin. ... The Philadelphia Inquirer reports that state Rep. Dwight Evans employs 12 staffers in his Northwest Philadelphia district office. Two have six-figure salaries. His total district staff budget is $820,000 a year. That's the highest in the General Assembly, The Inquirer reports. Darn near a million bucks for one legislator's office. Now that's outrageous. Any wonder why Pennsylvanians hold their legislators in the esteem of an ingrown toenail?

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.