The perversion of our "leaders" has reached its critical mass. And the behavior of these government-knows-best deviants is so despicable that it's difficult to believe it's not some comedy club parody. To wit:
• The imam at the center of the Ground Zero mosque controversy is being sent on a 15-day goodwill tour of the Middle East -- by the U.S. State Department. And American taxpayers are picking up the $16,000 tab for Feisal Abdul Rauf. This is the fella who said America essentially brought upon itself the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. He also refuses to call Hamas the terrorist group that it is.
And this isn't the imam's first tour "to promote religious tolerance." It's his fourth on the public dime.
• Then there's Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell. On Thursday, bristling with an arrogance that is the scion of ignorance, he shilled for not only a new tax on oil company profits but a gasoline tax increase on consumers of 4 cents a gallon that he rationalizes they won't even notice.
The former will contribute to decreased oil production and increased dependence on foreign oil. That latter will contribute to making thinner the already thin margins of every Pennsylvania business and ever tighter the already tight budgets of every Pennsylvania family.
These are but two of scores of examples of pure idiocy being sold as "good public policy." Election Day can't come soon enough. Start turning out the idiocy and its messengers.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.