ShareThis Page

Midweek briefing ...

| Wednesday, Aug. 25, 2010

The Daily Caller reports that U.S. taxpayer dollars are being used to rehabilitate 26 mosques in 19 countries. Are we "winning hearts and minds," as advocates claim, or are we underwriting the headquarters for radicals to plot our demise• ... The civilian death rate in Venezuela outpaced that of Iraq by a factor exceeding three in 2009, reports The New York Times. And the government of Hugo Chavez secured a court order requiring that at least one newspaper stop publishing gruesome photos of the carnage. Ah, socialist heaven. ... Times columnist Paul Krugman argues that not raising taxes on the richest 120,000 people in this country would be akin to the federal government cutting checks averaging $3 million to each. Is Mr. Krugman so intellectually bereft that he forgets whose money this is to begin with• ... So strapped is government in Philadelphia that it's targeting bloggers for payment of the City of Brotherly Love's annual business privilege license at $300 a pop, reports Philadelphia City Paper. What's next, one tax for inhaling and a second for exhaling• ... Speaking of intemperate moves, the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission will, effective Jan. 1, double the annual service fee for E-ZPass transponders from $3 to $6. What's the rate of inflation again?

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.