Restoring Honor: Gathering in D.C.
It's a huge weekend in the nation's capital for patriotic Americans.
Tonight, it's the "Take America Back Convention" at the DAR Constitution Hall in Washington, sponsored by FreedomWorks. Participants will learn of the hottest congressional races of the year and learn how to get out the vote in November.
And Saturday, it's the "Restoring Honor" rally at the Lincoln Memorial, co-hosted by Fox News host Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin, the former Alaska governor, the Republicans' vice-presidential nominee in 2008.
Organizers for the latter event, beginning at 10 a.m., are projecting attendance of up to 300,000. A counter-rally, led by the Rev. Al Sharpton, is expected to draw 3,000.
The "Restoring Honor" rally "will honor the troops, unite the American people under the principles of integrity and truth and make a pledge to restore honor within ourselves and our country," says Mr. Beck.
"There will be absolutely no politics involved," he said.
But that hasn't stopped the usual pimps of progressivism from trying to discredit both the message and the messenger. Many on the left have criticized the rally coming on the anniversary of Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" speech 47 years ago to the day.
Choosing that date (Beck says it was happenstance) "is insulting," says Marc Morial, president of the National Urban League. Which is a pretty bizarre thing to say considering what Dr. King stood for.
Here's hoping the "Restoring Honor" rally becomes one for the record books.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.