Another U.N. crock: Aiding thugs
How many more carrots will the United Nations dangle before North Korea while getting repeatedly struck over the head by the bamboo rod of this communist regime?
Fox News reports U.N. agencies are planning to bundle up more $290 million in aid for the repressive thugocracy. Oh, the full sum reportedly is not guaranteed.
Regardless, it would be another U.N. gift to a nuclear saber-rattling nation that has flouted Security Council resolutions, was accused of sinking a South Korean warship in March and threatened a joint U.S.-South Korean anti-submarine exercise last month.
Not that any of the U.N.'s "aid" will actually get to starving North Koreans -- with or without that nation's regime change.
Once again the U.N. is putting its wobbly cart before the horse. And vows of better safeguards, most notably from the U.N. Development Programme, are hardly reassuring. The same agency in 2007 provided North Korea with equipment that could be used in its nuclear program, according to an independent investigation.
Aid to impoverished North Koreans would be effective only if provided on the donors' terms, not Pyongyang's. A U.S.-led League of Democracies, unlike Turtle Bay, would at least recognize that much.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.