ShareThis Page

Ben who?

| Tuesday, Sept. 28, 2010

Ah, those football fates.

The Pittsburgh Steelers came close to cutting yeoman quarterback Charlie Batch. At 35 and supposedly not as durable as desired, he became the odd man out even as starter Ben Roethlisberger was suspended for conduct unbecoming an NFL player. After all, the Steelers had brought back Byron Leftwich and had Dennis Dixon in the fold.

But then Messrs. Leftwich and Dixon were hurt in games one and two, respectively. And that left Mr. Batch. Perhaps we should rephrase that: Thank God for Charlie Batch.

Batch, in his first start in nearly three years, showed just how durable he is by pacing the Steelers to a 38-13 victory at Tampa Bay on Sunday, throwing for three touchdown passes. Yes, he threw two interceptions but it was Batch who ignited an offense that had to be saved by the defense in the first two games.

The Steelers are 3-0 as they prepare to host the always ornery Baltimore Ravens, 2-1, on Sunday. And expect Batch to start.

But the question for the Steelers is, should Batch offer a repeat stellar performance, who will the starter be when Pittsburgh returns to action after its bye week at Heinz Field against the Cleveland Browns• Mr. Roethlisberger's suspension will be over.

That's a no-brainer: Charlie Batch.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.