ShareThis Page

Sunday pops

| Sunday, Oct. 31, 2010

Notes a New York Times headline: "Fraudulent voting re-emerges as a partisan issue." Since when is voter fraud a "partisan" issue• Since it's Republicans complaining about Democrat-orchestrated fraud, you can bet. ... Rick Santorum, the former Republican U.S. senator of Pennsylvania who's testing the presidential waters, was part and parcel last week of a three-day, 1,300-mile, 45-county bus tour across Iowa promoting the impeachment of three state Supreme Court judges who affirmed a new law that legalized gay marriage. The nation's going to economic hell in a Democrat handbasket and Mr. Santorum's busy defending state-sponsored discrimination• ... In non-election pops , WBAL-TV reports that the Baltimore City Health Department has issued its first "environmental citation" for a repeat violation of the city's trans fat ban. Seems the Healthy Choice company was fined $100 for using a banned level of a margarine product. Commented one poster to the station's website, "Meet me in the parking lot behind the church at midnight. We got biscuits, nachos, fries, highest quality stuff. Smuggled in from Cuba." You can bet one of Baltimore's favorite literary sons, H.L. Mencken, would have the right word for this Food Police nonsense. Yes, "buncombe."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.