ShareThis Page

The Thursday wrap

| Thursday, Jan. 27, 2011

Value added: Surely the NFL is pinching itself over the Feb. 6 Super Bowl matchup between Pittsburgh and Green Bay. After all, last Sunday's AFC Championship Game between the Steelers and the New York Jets was the most-watched AFC title game of all time. Viewership averaged nearly 55 million people. So, the Steelers should bring some great ratings to Super Bowl XLV. Perhaps the Packers will bring some canned meat?

Two-faced Barack: President Obama has been offering effusive praise of Ronald Reagan as of late. Perhaps it's in advance of the celebration of Mr. Reagan's 100th birthday on Feb. 6. But as The Washington Examiner's Byron York reminds, the president not so long ago loved to dis The Gipper, including accusing "Reagan and his minions" of carrying out "their dirty deeds." Tell us how you really feel, Mr. President.

Played for fools: Chinese-born pianist Lang Lang played the anti-American propaganda tune "My Motherland" during his performance at the White House state dinner last week for Chinese President Hu Jintao. That's the song in which U.S. soldiers are referred to as "jackals." We would remind Mr. Lang that a similar display of ungracious freedom of expression in his homeland would have led to his execution.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.