ShareThis Page

The Thursday wrap

| Thursday, March 10, 2011

A better solution :The banking lobby is arguing that a proposed cut in the fee banks charge retailers for each swipe of a debit card -- from an average of 44 cents per transaction to 12 cents -- will leave them unable to afford to issue debit cards or force them to raise other fees to cover the loss, reports The New York Times. Using cash should solve that problem, eh?

Climate fraud: A federal government inspector general "has revealed prima facie proof that the so-called independent inquiries widely if implausibly described as clearing the ClimateGate principals of wrongdoing were, in fact, whitewashes," writes Chris Horner of the Competitive Enterprise Institute in the Daily Caller. One of those "studies" was conducted by Penn State. He says the university may have been "complicit" in a "cover-up." Stay tuned.

Gas taxes: The spike in gasoline prices has sparked the usual cries about Big Oil "gouging" the public, never mind supply and demand, never mind the "futures" market. But you're not hearing a whole lot about the real gouging that's going on -- in the form of federal and state taxes on gasoline. Combined, they exceed the total increases over the last month or so. And don't blame "speculation," which actually helps to ensure steady supplies. But do blame, in part, government "speculators," so to speak.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.