ObamaCare's 1-year toll
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Sunday, March 27, 2011
ObamaCare -- aka the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act -- won't take full effect until 2014, but the results of its first year show that it's not worth its staggering, tax-hiking costs.
The Heritage Foundation ( heritage.org ) neatly sums up the law's downsides to date in a new "One-Year Checkup" report. Those downsides clearly outweigh "benefits" that ObamaCare supporters tout.
Health insurance is more costly and child-only policies have largely vanished because of ObamaCare's insurance mandates. And President Obama's promise that Americans would be able to keep their existing coverage• ObamaCare regulations make that impossible to fulfill.
Those regulations run to more than 6,500 pages . And the 1,000-and-counting waivers granted to exempt various entities from compliance prove that ObamaCare increases government control -- and that the Obama White House knows it can't work.
Higher premiums, higher taxes, fewer choices, more government control and reduced competition -- all in just one year -- should give Congress more than enough reasons to change course. Further disaster come 2014 must be averted by scrapping ObamaCare in favor of reforms that put consumers and patients first and rein in health care entitlements.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.