By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, May 7, 2011
The Ellis School's new partnership bolstering Carnegie Library for the Blind and Physically Handicapped's free services is a prime example of private-sector involvement leveraging public resources for greater good than could be achieved otherwise.
Melissa Dodge teaches French and English at the private Shadyside school and narrates and edits audiobooks as a volunteer for the library, which receives state and federal tax money. She arranged for classroom recording of Pennsylvania-focused books -- a program requirement.
As the young voice for the partnership's pilot phase, the Ellis faculty chose Zaynee Malik, 17. The junior's Pittsburgh Musical Theater background lends flair to her audiobook recordings.
The partnership is such an instant hit that Ellis already plans to offer a 10-day mini-course about audiobooks before this school year ends and will continue the program this fall.
Hopefully, that means more students will -- like Zaynee -- experience the joys of helping others who face challenges different from their own. And that more young, visually impaired readers will have more audiobooks newly available.
Kudos to those involved for blazing an exemplary trail across the public/private divide toward bigger, better benefits for all.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.