ShareThis Page

Primary endorsements: The Trib says ...

| Sunday, May 15, 2011

Here's a recap of our recommendations for Tuesday's primary election:

For Allegheny County chief executive


• Neither Rich Fitzgerald nor Mark Patrick Flaherty.

The former is a tool of the unions, a practitioner of pay-to-play government and a constitutional nose-thumber extraordinaire.

The latter acts like he's doing the public some kind of favor in his role as county controller by doing the job that the law requires him to do.



• Neither Chuck McCullough nor D. Raja.

The former faces trial in September on felony fraud and theft charges. 'Nuff said.

The latter counts on polling -- not the law, not the Pennsylvania Constitution -- as his guiding principle that begets political pandering.


For Allegheny County Council

At-large Republican seat:

• Heather Heidelbaugh

She'll shake up the conservative minority and restore maturity to the kindergarten.

For Allegheny County Common Pleas Court

• Michael Marmo

Tough but compassionate. Fair. Who could ask for more?

For Westmoreland County Board of Commissioners


R. Tyler Courtney and Joe Bush

Nominating this pair will give Republicans their best chance in a long time to take control of county government in the fall. We can't think of a better way to end the era of Democrat antagonist Tom Balya.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.