ShareThis Page

... & dangerous CFLs

| Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Pricey compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) are even more dangerous -- and make even less economic sense -- than previously thought. They're fire hazards and mercury's just the tip of their toxic iceberg.

Edmund Contoski reports for the American Thinker that Telstar- and Electra-brand CFLs were recalled on May 12 as overheating fire hazards. And he notes that cleaning up after CFLs flame out usually breaks environmental regulations.

New Armorlite-brand CFLs add a protective outer shell that resembles an incandescent bulb, with a special inner coating. But Armorlite says they're "safer," not "safe." And if one burns your house down, all you'll get from Armorlite is a replacement bulb -- if you saved your receipt.

Mailing back spent CFLs is cost-prohibitive -- and regulations make it practically impossible. And while Armorlite claims its CFLs have less mercury, they also contain lead, arsenic, cyanide and other toxins -- and still don't work with dimmers or timers.

Mr. Contoski calls the 2014 incandescent ban the work of "statists" and "a monument to the failure of their ideology and their ignorance of economics." He thus illuminates how banning incandescents is an even dimmer dim-bulb idea than Americans already knew.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.