No forced pooling
By opposing "forced pooling," Gov. Tom Corbett is helping Pennsylvania strike the proper balance between the rapidly developing Marcellus shale natural gas industry and property owners' rights.
Common in states with established oil and gas industries, forced pooling compels property owners to join neighbors in agreeing to gas leases. Drillers want it in Pennsylvania, too, saying it would mean fewer wells and more efficient extraction -- and calling it "fair pooling," the Scranton Times-Tribune reports. The governor's Marcellus Shale Advisory Commission also favors the practice.
While it might be "fair" to drillers, it wouldn't be to property owners.
Pennsylvanians who don't own their land's mineral rights have no argument to make. But for those who do, forced pooling would violate their right to keep their property free of drilling -- a misuse of state power that Gov. Corbett opposes.
"I do not believe in private eminent domain, and forced pooling would be exactly that," he told an industry gathering in April, according to ProPublica.
Corbett -- a staunch drilling supporter -- must honor his pledge not to sign forced pooling legislation. Hopefully, he will defend Pennsylvanians' property rights as resolutely as he's otherwise defended the economically promising shale gas industry to date.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.