Teacher pay: Overcompensated
A new Heritage Foundation study overturns the conventional wisdom that public-school teachers are underpaid, finding their compensation actually exceeds market value by $120 billion.
For example, when teachers and non-teachers' cognitive ability -- not their own educational attainment, a more common measure -- is compared, the wage gap disappears. And that's not the only indicator of overcompensation.
Public-school teachers earn more than private-school teachers. And when non-teachers take teaching jobs, they make about 9 percent more; when teachers take non-teaching jobs, they make about 3 percent less.
Salaries for similarly skilled public-school teachers and private-sector workers are comparable. But teachers' retiree health care benefits -- almost unknown in the private sector -- are worth about an extra 10 percent of wages, with their job security worth another 1 percent to 8.6 percent.
That makes teachers' "total compensation 52 percent greater than fair market levels, equivalent to more than $120 billion overcharged to taxpayers each year," the study concludes.
Distorted by teachers unions, it's a market that's neither free nor fair -- especially to the taxpayers whose pockets are plundered to overpay teachers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.