TribLIVE

| News


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

The tree tax: It's pointless

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Saturday, Nov. 12, 2011
 

The Obama administration surely should have second thoughts about imposing -- by executive fiat, under a 1996 federal law -- a tax on fresh-cut Christmas trees that defies logic.

Quick criticism led the Obama Agriculture Department to delay a new 15-cent tax on each Christmas tree sold by producers who sell more than 500 annually. The revenue would fund a new, image- and sales-enhancing Christmas Tree Promotion Board.

Yet, as David S. Addington writes for The Heritage Foundation blog, The Foundry, "the American Christmas tree has a great image that doesn't need any help from the government." That said, why is the government involved at all?

The National Christmas Tree Association, which wants the tax and the promotion board, says real trees overwhelmingly outsold fake trees, their only real competition, in 2010 -- 27 million, worth $976 million at retail, vs. 8.2 million, worth $530 million -- and the economy has little effect on real trees' sales.

It would be a pointless tax. Yet Agriculture disingenuously denies it would be a tax, despite -- as Mr. Addington points out -- mandating its payment and directing its revenue.

Only bureaucrats enamored of any and all taxes would even consider such idiocy. They richly deserve the coal they'll find in their Christmas stockings.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read News