ShareThis Page

Christmas takes

| Tuesday, Dec. 20, 2011

Allegheny County would not be mired in the reassessment mess it is had R. Stanton Wettick, the senior Common Pleas judge overseeing the repeatedly court-ordered process, found county officials who thumbed their noses at the rule of law in contempt of court and jailed them for their delay tactics. Pssst! There's still that option, Judge Wettick. ... Is there anybody left in the commonwealth who isn't wondering if the latest public corruption charges lodged against one of the Sisters Orie are a prelude to state Supreme Court Justice Joan Orie Melvin being charged by Allegheny County prosecutors• Perhaps those named Orie but few others. ... Dan Onorato , the departing Allegheny County chief executive, has a new gig come Jan. 3 -- "chief external affairs and communications officer" for Highmark Inc. That's corporate jargon for "chief flack." Considering Dan, Dan the Tax Man's many verity-defying pronouncements as ACE, the axiom that the first casualty of public relations is the truth appears to be quite safe. ... We're not the biggest fans of Britain's Prince Charles. But Western Pennsylvanians so enamored with wind power should heed his recent remarks. The industry really exists only because of public subsidies, he says, and those insisting that wind power is one of the most cost-effective forms of renewable energy believe in "fairy tales." And that from a devout eco-wacko.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.