ShareThis Page

Kim and Havel: Death and dichotomies

| Tuesday, Dec. 20, 2011

Two world leaders, one current and one past, died over the weekend. And their legacies are as stark as they are different:

• Kim Jong-il, 69, North Korea's communist dictator since 1994, died Saturday. True to form, government-controlled media said the long ill Mr. Kim died of "overwork."

Kim indeed worked hard -- starving his people in favor of pursuing a rogue nuclear arsenal and a lavish, narcissistic lifestyle.

He's succeeded by his son, the still largely unknown Kim Jong-un, 27 or 28, who, according to insiders, might be a puppet for Chang Sung-taek, the late Kim's brother-in-law.

Thus, the new dictator(s) look(s) a lot like the old. And an entire people will continue to pay -- with their liberties and their stomachs.

• Vaclav Havel, 75, the dissident playwright who became the voice of peace and freedom for Czechoslovakia -- and later its president -- died Sunday.

Mr. Havel rose to prominence after the Soviet-led invasion of 1968. The communists sought to silence Havel by jailing him numerous times. But it only drew more attention to his works and led to some of Havel's most insightful essays.

As Soviet dominance waned, Havel was the right man at the right time to help free Czechoslovakia.

We mourn the passing of Vaclav Havel. But we celebrate the beacon he powered.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.