The Thursday wrap
Jon Huntsman left the hunt for the Republican nomination for president, citing, in part, the divisive nature of the campaign. He called for a return to how things were in the Founding era. That's an interesting piece of advice, considering the politics of that day featured tarring and feathering and pillorying. ... The National Center for Science Education says it has begun an effort to defend the teaching of man-made climate change in America's schools. Should any school district allow such blatant propaganda to be introduced into its curriculum -- without balancing it with the ample credible scientific evidence to the contrary -- those responsible should be fired. ... Regular Trib economics columnist Donald J. Boudreaux says President Obama's "aggressive campaign to shrink the size of the federal government" -- by consolidating six agencies into one -- is akin to a median-income U.S. household "slashing" $4.16 from its yearly spending. Ah, more "progressive" savings. ... Reports The Washington Times: "It's official: Congress ended its least-productive year in modern history after passing 80 bills -- fewer than any other session since year-end records began being kept in 1947." Heck, that should be considered a victory for the American people, right?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.