The race for president: Mitt's moment
Rick Santorum got all bristled-up that Newt Gingrich would even suggest that he drop out of the race for the Republican presidential nomination.
Then came Tuesday's Florida primary and Messrs. Santorum and Gingrich were spanked -- sharply and thoroughly -- by Mitt Romney.
Turgid to form, Gingrich has vowed to carry the nomination fight to the GOP convention floor in Tampa this summer.
Oh, goody -- a vainglorious bowlful of jelly plans to tour the country in promotion of Suicide by Newt.
It's time for Newt to take his own advice and drag Little Ricky with him -- get out of the race.
Exit polls in the Sunshine State show Mr. Romney broadening the depth of his support in just about all measurable strata -- conservatives, moderates, seniors, Latinos (the latter being a category in which Gingrich has expended much time and money).
Those same exit polls show Florida voters selected Romney because they believe he's the best candidate to tackle our economic problems and has the best chance to defeat Barack Obama -- the guy who's presided over the nation's economic train wreck and the conductor of the steam engine whose boiler is about to explode.
The time is now for the Republican Party to coalesce around Mitt Romney and get on with the business of exposing and defeating Barack Obama.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.