ShareThis Page

The Thursday wrap

| Thursday, Feb. 2, 2012

Just days apart , employees in the Philadelphia and New York archdioceses have been charged with stealing millions of dollars from church coffers. Which should prompt an immediate review of accounting practices and oversight in every diocese. ... The Associated Press reported that "global warming" is behind the U.S. Department of Agriculture revising those color-coded planting zones found on the back of seed packets. But that's patently false. Experts attribute the changes to better temperature monitoring and mapping technology. Looks like the AP has an agenda. ... The Obama administration continues to insist that its bailout of the domestic automobile industry is an American success story. But taxpayers now are estimated to have lost nearly $24 billion in the "deal." The government continues to hold a 26.5 percent share of General Motors and a 74 percent stake in Ally Financial Inc., GM's successor financing arm. These cats in Washington certainly have a warped way of defining "success." ... Or as Mitt Romney likes to put it: "Once we thought 'entitlement' meant that Americans were entitled to the privilege of trying to succeed in the greatest country in the world. But today the new entitlement battle is over the size of the check you get from Washington." Sigh.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.