ShareThis Page

The Thursday wrap

| Thursday, Feb. 9, 2012

The New York Times says the Obama administration will "dispatch Cabinet officials" and "senior advisers at the White House" to urge campaign donors to support Priorities USA Action, the Democrats' top "super PAC." So, why isn't the Federal Election Commission investigating the administration for clearly violating the Hatch Act and laws against campaigns coordinating efforts with "independent" political action committees• ... Most of that "Detroit comeback" Super Bowl commercial for Chrysler (or was it for the Obama administration?) featuring Clint Eastwood was filmed in New Orleans and Los Angeles. Nothing like truth in advertising, eh• ... No, it wasn't appropriate for singer M.I.A. to flip her middle finger in an obscene gesture during the Super Bowl halftime show. But, truth be told, one is more likely to see that gesture more often -- and for a far longer duration -- on one's daily commute to work. ... Next time you hear about the American Medical Association weighing in on this subject or that, consider this: Dr. Richard A. Armstrong reminds in The Washington Times that the AMA now represents only 15 percent of the nation's practicing physicians. Dr. Armstrong's point -- the AMA really doesn't represent American doctors.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.