ShareThis Page

The Thursday wrap

| Thursday, April 19, 2012

Funny, but we don't remember Tim Murphy -- suddenly playing the role of a born-again conservative in his 18th Congressional District primary -- criticizing those third-party American Chemistry Council campaign ads on his behalf. Isn't it the kind of ad he now professes to be so "deeply concerned" about• Can you say "weaselly," class• ... A quick review of Associated Press stories over the last few weeks shows the same old political correctness in referring to illegal aliens (as "undocumented immigrants") and to terrorists (as either "militants" or "insurgents"). Of course, the day that all ends will be the day the AP starts referring to "progressives" as what they are -- socialists. ... The New York Times has declared war on sphagnum peat moss . Yes, you read that right. The Times laments that peat moss releases "its stored carbon, adding to the climate-altering carbon dioxide we are already pouring into the atmosphere." The Times recommends we replace peat moss with homemade compost, which itself generates, you guessed it, heat and, you guessed it again, carbon dioxide. Go figure. ... Himalayan glaciers are growing despite "global warming," report French scientists. Damn "climate change deniers," eh?

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.