Pitt's Baldwin cleared of charges
College Football Videos
An Allegheny County judge Monday found Pitt receiver Jonathan Baldwin not guilty of all charges stemming from a dispute where police said he touched a woman's buttocks on a bus.
Common Pleas Judge Kevin G. Sasinoski acquitted Baldwin, 20, of one count of indecent assault and two summary charges after a brief non-jury trial yesterday.
The charges stemmed from an April 18 incident on a shuttle bus where a woman said she was walking down the bus aisle when Baldwin slapped her buttocks, according to a police affidavit.
"It should have never been there (in court), to be honest with you," said Baldwin's attorney Craig Lee. "The only reason it was there was because it was Jon. There was no evidence whatsoever, other than it was meant to be a playful gesture -- not an insult -- although Jonathan felt bad about it and wanted to apologize for it but never was presented the opportunity."
Pitt's judicial affairs department ordered him to participate in 10 hours of community service for the incident.
Baldwin earned first-team all-Big East honors for his standout sophomore season. He was a football star at Aliquippa High School before going to Pitt. He was named a U.S. Army All-American at Aliquippa.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.