When Zach Brown left Royal Palm Beach (Fla.) High School in 2007, he narrowed his college choices to Wisconsin and Pitt.
He chose Wisconsin, ultimately earning a History degree and a reputation as a punishing — but little-used — running back.
This season, he gets a second chance at a college career, moving into his new home — at Pitt.
"I'm just looking for an opportunity," he said after picking Pitt over Miami (Fla.) this time.
With Ray Graham as the only back on scholarship, Pitt could use the help.
"I'm excited about having him," Pitt co-offensive coordinator Calvin Magee said. "I'm excited about the experience he is going to bring. He's been in big games. He's a big, punishing running back. Now, we have two veterans (backs) who have been in the game and understand what we want."
Brown, who was twice voted his high school team's most unselfish player, epitomizes what Pitt is seeking, Magee said.
"He brings a great work ethic and so much character. This is what we are preaching."
Brown, 5-foot-10, 220 pounds, rushed for 1,152 career yards, but only 584 after a productive freshman year.
He didn't fall out of favor at Wisconsin, but the Badgers had James White, John Clay and Montee Ball, who rushed for 1,052, 1,012 and 996 yards, respectively, last season. Brown decided to redshirt.
After earning a 3.1 grade-point average at Wisconsin, Brown will pursue a post-graduate degree at Pitt in Health and Physical Activity. Because Wisconsin didn't offer such a degree, he is eligible to play immediately but only for one season.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.