Pitt coach names captains for 2011 season
College Football Videos
Junior Tino Sunseri was named a team captain for the 2011 season, something coach Todd Graham said revealed a lot about his quarterback.
"I told Tino that if we had voted on that in the spring, I don't think that would have happened," Graham said.
Guard Chris Jacobson and wide receiver Mike Shanahan join Sunseri as offensive captains, while cornerback Antwuan Reed and safety Jarred Holley join nose tackle Myles Caragein on defense. Junior Andrew Taglianetti was named special teams captain.
Graham said the captains were selected based on input of selected players and coaches — "people that have merit" — and said it's not a popularity contest. Freshmen, for instance, weren't allowed to vote.
Caragein, Shanahan and Jacobson were unanimous choices.
"It's a great honor," Jacobson said. "All your teammates and peers look up to you and respect you. I'm thankful for that."
» Lucas Nix (6-foot-6, 310) and Jacobson (6-3, 295) are more than leaders. They form one of the best guard tandems in the Big East, if not the nation.
"It makes us a better football team," Graham said. "It makes us so much more sound from the inside out, having him and Jacobson at guard."
Nix, a fifth-year senior, had shuffled between tackle and guard on the right side.
"If you ask me personally, I do think he's a better guard than a tackle," Graham said, "and he's really good at both."
» Pitt has 14 seniors who will be beginning their final season Saturday against Buffalo. Some, like Wisconsin transfer Zach Brown, just got here. Others, like Caragein, Lindsey, Jacobson and Gibbs, are fifth-year seniors. The importance of their final season in careers without an outright Big East title or BCS Bowl is not lost on the veterans.
"We want to make it count," Jacobson said. "We have to do everything right every day."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.