ShareThis Page

Bostick fine with losing redshirt

| Wednesday, Oct. 22, 2008

He used a season of eligibility for the sake of handing off three times and taking a knee to run out the clock against Navy, but Pat Bostick insists he isn't upset about losing an opportunity to redshirt.

"I'm the backup quarterback on a team that's trying to win a championship," Bostick said Tuesday. "Whatever they deem necessary to do that, trying to prepare ourselves to win a championship. We're getting into the thick of things now. I've got to get ready to help this team win."

After starting the final eight games as a freshman last season, Bostick was beaten out for the starting job by redshirt junior Bill Stull in August.

Bostick, however, handled the bulk of second-team snaps in practice. Pitt coach Dave Wannstedt said he planned to play Bostick but never had the chance because the Panthers' first five games were so close.

With No. 17 Pitt (5-1, 2-0 Big East conference) heading into the thick of its conference schedule with a game against Rutgers (2-5, 1-2) at 3:30 p.m. Saturday, Wannstedt said Bostick's playing time against Navy, little as it was, could prove invaluable.

"If Billy gets hurt the first play against Rutgers, I feel a lot better, even though Pat only played four minutes," Wannstedt said. "He took some snaps, the crowd was screaming and he got the signals. If you ask Pat right now, Pat would feel better today about going in than he did if he hadn't ever taken a snap. That's a matter of how you're looking at it, but that's how the decision was made."

Bostick called the Navy appearance "very important," considering it was his first in a game since Pitt's 13-9 victory at West Virginia in the season finale last Dec. 1.

"Practice is one thing," Bostick said, but "in a game situation, it's totally different because there's 11 guys on the field, and you're the ringleader."

Wannstedt hopes the move sent a clear message to the Panthers that he wants to win now. Pitt is in first place in the Big East and needs two victories to clinch its first bowl berth in four seasons under Wannstedt.

"It was mentioned that (a redshirt) was a possibility," Bostick said, "but the primary focus of both myself and this coaching staff -- and this team -- was to win a championship and put a good product out there on Saturdays. ... If you're not thinking about that, then you don't belong here."

Wannstedt also noted the significance of saving a redshirt for season-ending injuries, pointing to receiver Derek Kinder, defensive tackle Gus Mustakas and Stull as examples of players who benefited by having one available.

On the flip side, playing Bostick could be construed as Pitt coaches no longer believing he can be its quarterback of the future. If Stull and Bostick remain in their roles again next season, Bostick would have only one remaining season to compete for the starting job.

Yet Bostick downplayed taking a redshirt, saying it "shouldn't even be talked about during the season."

"The important thing is, I'm not worried about the future right now, and this team is not worried about the future right now. We're worried about right now," Bostick said. "I think it's natural to think about the future, and there are questions that arise as a result of what happened. But it's also important to know that I'm helping this team to win every game, every week, and whatever the circumstances are for me to go on the field, that's what I'm prepared for."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.