ShareThis Page

Ditka visits with Panthers

| Thursday, Oct. 23, 2008

Mike Ditka and Da Panthers?

It's not as synonymous as Ditka and Da Bears, but the former Pitt great spoke to the team before practice Wednesday and urged the No. 17 Panthers to make the most of their season in the spotlight.

"I just told them to have fun," Ditka said, "that they're going through the best times of their life and to enjoy it, to respect the game, respect their opponents, respect their teammates and have fun doing it."

Ditka was a unanimous All-America tight end in 1960 before becoming a Chicago Bears first-round draft choice. He won an NFL championship with the Bears, a Super Bowl as a player with the Dallas Cowboys and, later, as head coach of the Bears. He's in the college and pro football halls of fame and is one of eight Pitt players to have his jersey (No. 89) retired.

"I constantly talk about tradition at Pitt, and that's what separates us from most of the other ones," Pitt coach Dave Wannstedt said. "You can't say the words 'Pitt tradition' without saying 'Mike Ditka.' For him to come back and spend some time with the players, I think it's a neat thing."

Wannstedt took advantage of the moment to introduce Ditka, an Aliquippa native, to a pair of Panthers from his hometown in redshirt freshman linebacker Brandon Lindsey and freshman receiver Jonathan Baldwin.

"The kids that came to Pitt made a wise choice, and they're going to get a great education," said Ditka, who was in Pittsburgh for today's grand opening of a Ditka's Restaurant in Robinson. "Football only continues on with a very few of us. I was fortunate that I could carry on to pro ball. But most of these guys the education is going to take you the rest of the way."

Road to revenge

Pitt suffered close losses to Navy, Rutgers and Louisville last season and is seeking to avenge those defeats this season.

The Panthers beat Navy, 42-21. They play Rutgers on Saturday and Louisville on Nov. 8.

"We did what we wanted to do last week against Navy. Now, we're coming back with Rutgers," receiver Oderick Turner said. "We've lost to them the last three years, so it's really revenge that we're seeking right now."

Wannstedt said he won't use it as a motivational tactic but hopes his players reverse the outcomes.

"I think our players need to feel that and understand that Rutgers has been a thorn in our side the last few years," said Wannstedt, who's 0-3 against the Scarlet Knights. "We've got an opportunity to go out this year and do something about it, and we need to do it."

Turner said he took last season's 20-16 loss to Rutgers "personal," in part because he's from New Jersey and had a potential game-winning touchdown reception reversed by a controversial offensive pass-interference penalty.

"Just knowing that maybe if that one game could have went the other way, we could have gone to a bowl game," Turner said. "It weighs heavy on my shoulders."

Backing up

Pitt offensive coordinator Matt Cavanaugh pointed to "probably consistency more than anything" in sophomore Pat Bostick beating out redshirt sophomore Kevan Smith for the backup quarterback job.

Cavanaugh also admitted that the timing of playing Bostick late in the fourth quarter was "probably not" perfect. But he believed it was important because starter Bill Stull has been "banged around a little" this season with hip and shoulder injuries, and "you never know when he's going to come out."

"Obviously, it would have maybe been better if we'd stuck him at the beginning of the fourth quarter and given him a lot more work, but we're a little slow to feel comfortable with a lead," Cavanaugh said. "We didn't think it would be fair to just throw (Pat) on the field.

"It could have been a better situation, the timing could have been better, but we accomplished what we wanted to. We wanted to get him some reps. Hopefully, we can continue that and have him ready if he has to play."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.