Harrisburg WR picks Panthers
College Football Videos
Pitt's newest recruit hails from the same high school as LeSean McCoy, and though they play different skill positions, Salath Williams was attracted to the opportunity to star in the Panthers' pro-style offense.
Williams, a 6-foot-4, 185-pound receiver from Harrisburg's Bishop McDevitt, announced Wednesday his verbal commitment to Pitt. He picked the Panthers over Iowa and Purdue but had 20 scholarship offers, including Connecticut, Maryland, Michigan State, Rutgers and West Virginia.
"They're going to give me an opportunity to catch a lot of passes," said Williams, who was recruited by Pitt tight ends coach Brian Angelichio. "I'm a playmaker. I'm a deep threat. They can throw it up and I'll go get it."
Williams had 49 receptions for 899 yards and 11 touchdowns last fall despite playing in a spread offense with a pair of Division I prospects in Jeremy Cornelius - who committed to Purdue yesterday - and Aaron Sye.
Bishop McDevitt coach Jeff Weachter said Williams has been timed in the 40-yard dash at 4.5 seconds, but he believes he has potential to become faster because he was bothered by an ankle injury all season.
"He's very flexible and can adjust his body to the ball in the air really well," Weachter said. "He went to Pitt's 7-on-7 camp last year and kind of dominated. It really opened up Pitt's eyes."
Williams is the Panthers' fifth recruit from the Class of 2010, joining Wilmington linebacker Derrrick Burns, Penn Hills defensive tackle Aaron Donald, Hyattsville (Md.) safety Jeff Knox and Paterson (N.J.) Catholic defensive lineman T.J. Clemmings.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.