Share This Page

Tight end commits to Pitt

Pitt's pro-style offense attracted Brendan Carozzoni almost as much as the Panthers' depth chart at his position.

The 6-foot-4, 215-pound tight end from Cleveland's St. Ignatius made a verbal commitment to Pitt Wednesday, picking the Panthers over Indiana and West Virginia. He also had scholarship offers from Marshall and a host of Mid-American Conference schools.

The Panthers will lose tight ends Nate Byham and Dorin Dickerson to graduation after this season, and senior John Pelusi's career was shortened by recurring shoulder surgeries.

''Pitt's very appealing,'' said Carozzoni, who had 25 receptions for 380 yards and two touchdowns for the Ohio Division 1 champions last fall. ''I'm somone that flexes out and can add speed to catch the ball, but I can block also. That the depth chart was favorable was definitely a factor.''

Carozzoni, who was recruited by running backs coach David Walker, said he was impressed by Pitt's coaching staff and facilities during an unofficial visit last week. He is the Panthers' 14th recruit from the Class of 2010.

''I liked it there,'' Carozzoni said, ''and I wanted to make my decision before my senior season.''

Additional Information:

Pitt fire pit

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.